Colin Blakemore and his associates at Cambridge University have attempted to test the angular-displacement theory by requiring observers to set a comparison line parallel to one side of an acute-angle pattern. They assumed that an overestimation of the angle can be demonstrated by measuring the perceived orientation of its sides. When the observers were asked to set the comparison line parallel to one side of the angle, they in fact placed it in a different orientation. The effect was appreciably greater for small angles (those of around 10 degrees) than it was for large angles. What is the mechanism that explains the angular- displacement effect? The currently favored theory is based on Hubel and Wiesel’s discovery of cells in the visual cortex that "detect" contour orientation on the retina. A given contour orientation on the retina—–say, a vertical line —–triggers activity in a whole population of cortical orientation detectors in the brain, but more so in those most attuned to that retinal orientation (e.g., vertical) and less so in those tuned to different retinal orientations (e.g., plus or minus a few degrees from the vertical). The presence of an adjacent contour of different orientation (e.g., 5 degrees clockwise) would have the effect of inhibiting some of these units from firing. The peak of activity shifts away from the one that would occur without the presence of the second contour (e.g., the peak would now be at 3 degrees counterclockwise). This is an example of the broader category of neural functioning known as lateral inhibition, which was discussed in Chapter 2. In that earlier example, the inhibition concerned intensity (or luminance) based on the rate of firing of neurons, where activity in one fiber had the effect of reducing the rate in an adjacent fiber. Here, it is the contour orientation rather than intensity that is relevant. This physiological theory, then, attributes illusions to the "hardware" of the visual nervous system, a very different explanation from others we have been considering.